Skip to content
TiMiNa
Use case · illustrative

Trade promotion, turned into profit.

Trade spend is usually the largest cost line after COGS, and most of it runs on spreadsheets and instinct. Here is the whole cycle run by agents: planned, predicted before commit, executed to the store, reconciled, and analyzed in time for the next promotion. Every figure is illustrative, a worked example you can pressure-test.

What leaks today

Where the money goes missing.

01

Trade spend planned on spreadsheets and instinct, the largest cost line after COGS.

02

Claims paid that should have been rejected, with no audit trail.

03

Post-event analysis arriving after the next promo already launched.

The agentic pipeline

Trade promotion, planned to proven

Six agents hand off in sequence, data flowing between them. Watch the active agent think, then pass the work on.

1
PlanTrade Promotion Planning Agent
2
PredictForecast Agent
3
CommitTerms Agent
4
ExecutePromotion Execution Agent
5
ReconcileClaims and Deduction Agent
6
AnalyzePost-Promo Analysis Agent
trade_promotion_planning_agent.livestage 1/6

Mechanic, SKUs, target outlets, budget, and timing drafted.

Trade Promotion Planning Agent · thinking
Inside the stages

Predicted before commit. Proven after.

Three moments where the agents turn judgment into numbers: the profit case before spend, execution scored to the store, and the result against the prediction.

Stage 2 · Predict

Model the profit before you spend.

Before a cent of budget is committed, the agent builds the profit case: baseline, incremental volume, trade spend, and the net. A clear go or no-go, not a hunch.

Profit waterfall · indexedProfit positive · go
100Baseline+23+ Incremental-12- Trade spend111Net profit
Store execution · scored0 / 300 outlets compliant
CompliantPartialNon-compliant
Stage 4 · Execute

Track execution to the store.

Driven by rep photos and sell-out, the agent scores every outlet compliant, partial, or non-compliant, so money spent has proof behind it and gaps get fixed while the promo still runs.

Stage 6 · Analyze

Prove it against the prediction.

Actual lift against predicted, real ROI, and claim leakage prevented, fast enough to act on the next cycle, with a clear recommendation to repeat, fix, or kill.

Predicted vs actualPredictedActual
+23%
+21%
Incremental units
1.6x
1.7x
Trade-spend ROI
85%
80%
Outlet compliance
Recommendation

Repeat. Real ROI 1.7x, claim leakage prevented, lift within 2 points of prediction.

Manual vs agentic

The same cycle, two speeds.

Today the trade-spend cycle runs for weeks and lands too late to act on. Run by agents, it is continuous and near real-time.

Manual6+ weeks
  • Planned on spreadsheets and instinct
  • Claims paid that should be rejected
  • Post-event analysis lands after the next promo
AgenticContinuous
  • Profit predicted before a cent is committed
  • Execution tracked down to the store
  • Claims reconciled, analysis in a day
Illustrative economics

What the cycle returns.

+0%Incremental units predicted before commit
0.0xTrade-spend ROI on the worked example
0%Of promo claims auto-reconciled
0 dayFrom event end to actionable analysis

Illustrative worked example, not a client result.

Book a call to map your highest-leverage promotion.

One conversation to find the promotion or territory where agents pay back fastest, and what it takes to ship them.